Introduction

In response to the increasing demand for efficient data collection within smart cityenvironments, there arises a critical requirement for robust and scalable communicationinfrastructures. This study endeavors to assess the feasibility of integrating Meshtastic nodesand LoRaWAN technology to create a reliable network for transmitting utility meter data.

Technical Feasibility

Network Architecture

Layer 1: LoRaWAN Gateway

- Positioned centrally on the ground level to optimize coverage.

- Responsible for data aggregation and forwarding to a backend server.

This is the topmost layer in the network architecture. The LoRaWAN Gateway acts as thecentral communication hub. It is responsible for collecting data transmitted by lower layersand forwarding it to a central network server. These gateways are typically positioned tooptimize area coverage and network efficiency

Layer 2: Heltec V3 Devices as Meshtastic Gateway Nodes

- Strategically situated in homes and buildings to act as data relays.

- Serves as a pivotal bridge between the Meshtastic mesh network and the LoRaWAN network.

Positioned as an intermediary layer, these devices function as gateway nodes within theMeshtastic network, which is a long-range, low-power mesh network. Heltec V3 devices helprelay information from the utility meters to the LoRaWAN gateways, ensuring robust andcontinuous data flow even in urban environments where direct communication to theprimary gateway might be obstructed.

Layer 3: Meshtastic Nodes on Utility Meters

- Installed directly onto residential utility meters

- Forms a resilient mesh network, ensuring uninterrupted data transmission, even in challengingenvironments.

Located at the bottom layer, these nodes are directly installed on utility meters in residentialand commercial properties. They form a critical part of the network, collecting data from themeters and transmitting it through the mesh network up to the Heltec V3 gateway nodes.This setup ensures that data can be collected from widespread and hard-to-reach areaswithout the need for direct line-of-sight or extensive wiring.

‍

Technical Feasibility

Hardware and Software Requirements

➢ LoRaWAN Gateway: A high-capacity gateway equipped with robust connectivity capabilities.

➢ Heltec V3 Devices: Economical, energy-efficient microcontrollers featuring LoRafunctionalities.

➢ Meshtastic Nodes: Compact, battery-powered devices designed to establish a resilient meshnetwork.

➢ Software: Utilization of Arduino IDE, Meshtastic firmware, LoRaWAN libraries (such as LMIC),and a backend server infrastructure for data processing.

Implementation

➢ Installation: Strategic deployment of hardware components throughout the city, prioritizinglocations to optimize network coverage

➢ Configuration: Programming of Heltec V3 devices to effectively receive and relay Meshtasticmessages to the LoRaWAN gateway.

➢ Testing: Thorough evaluation procedures to validate the reliability of data transmission andensure the stability of the network.

Operational Feasibility

Maintenance and Support

➢ Routine Maintenance: Scheduled inspections of hardware components, particularly batteryoperated Meshtastic nodes, to uphold operational efficiency.

➢ Technical Support: Provision of dedicated assistance from a proficient team fortroubleshooting and overall network management.

➢ Scalability: Implementation of a scalable network architecture, facilitating seamlessexpansion through the addition of additional nodes as demand dictates.

Operational Feasibility

Training

➢ Staff Training: Comprehensive technical training sessions tailored for installation andmaintenance personnel to ensure proficient operation of the network infrastructure.

➢ User Training: Informative workshops and sessions conducted for residents to familiarizethem with the proper utilization and handling of utility meters equipped with Meshtasticnodes.

Financial Feasibility

Initial Investment

➢ Cost of Equipment: Includes procurement expenses for LoRaWAN gateways, Heltec V3devices, and Meshtastic nodes.

➢ Installation Costs: Encompasses expenditures associated with the deployment of hardwareinfrastructure throughout the city

Operational Costs

➢ Maintenance: Consists of ongoing expenses for routine maintenance activities such asbattery replacements and hardware repairs.

➢ Data Management: Entails the costs associated with operating and managing the backendserver infrastructure for efficient data processing.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

➢ Benefits: Anticipated advantages include enhanced data collection efficiency, decreasedmanual meter reading expenses, and improved data accuracy.

➢ ROI: Expected return on investment is projected through realized operational savings andadvancements in service delivery.

Risk Analysis

Technical Risks

➢ Interference: Risk of signal interference, particularly in densely populated areas where radiofrequency congestion is prevalent.

➢ Reliability: Ensuring continuous and reliable data transmission despite fluctuatingenvironmental conditions such as weather and terrain variations.

Operational Risks

➢ Maintenance: Challenges associated with the maintenance of battery-operated devices,including timely battery replacements and hardware upkeep.

➢ Scalability: Risks related to effectively managing network scalability while maintainingoptimal performance levels.

Mitigation Strategies

➢ Redundancy: Implementation of redundant nodes to mitigate the impact of potentialhardware failures and ensure network reliability.

➢ Regular Updates: Adoption of a proactive approach towards firmware and software updatesto address emerging issues and enhance overall system resilience.

‍

Conclusion

In conclusion, the integration of Meshtastic and LoRaWAN technologies within the proposed3-layer LoRa network demonstrates both technical and operational feasibility.Despite the initial investment required, the long-term advantages, including enhanced datacollection and operational efficiency, justify the expenditure. However, success hinges uponmeticulous planning, precise implementation, and diligent maintenance throughout the projectlifecycle. With these factors in mind, the proposed network stands poised to deliver significantvalue to its stakeholders.